Schedule access-review campaigns, pull together who has access to what across your systems, give managers a simple approve-or-revoke interface they'll actually finish, track revocations to completion, and export the signed history as audit-ready evidence.
Run quarterly or custom access-review cycles automatically, with reminders that keep them moving.
Pull together who has access to what across your connected systems for each reviewer.
A simple approve-or-revoke interface per user, with the context reviewers need to decide.
Scope reviews by system, team, or sensitivity so each reviewer sees only what's theirs.
Capture each decision with reviewer, timestamp, and notes — a record, not a vague recollection.
Track revoke decisions to completion so access actually changes, not just the spreadsheet.
See completion status across reviewers and chase only the stragglers, not everyone.
Export the full signed review history, mapped to the access controls it satisfies.
Automated nudges keep reviewers on track so campaigns close on time.
Step 1
Kick off quarterly or custom access-review cycles on a schedule, with reminders so they don't stall mid-campaign.
Step 2
Pull together who can reach what across your connected systems, so reviewers see real access, not a guess.
Step 3
Give managers a simple per-user interface with the context to decide — so reviews actually get completed.
Step 4
Track every revoke decision to completion, not just to a click — a decision isn't evidence until it's carried out.
Step 5
Capture signed, timestamped decisions and export the full history mapped to your access controls for the auditor.
Real access, not a spreadsheet
Access reviews fail when reviewers are handed a stale export and asked to recognize names. Pulling together real access from connected systems — scoped to what each reviewer owns — means decisions are made against current reality, with the context to tell an appropriate grant from one that should be revoked.
Completion, not clicks
A 'revoke' that never happens is a finding waiting to surface. Each decision is captured with the reviewer, timestamp, and notes, and revoke decisions are tracked to completion — so the control is satisfied by access that actually changed, not by an intention recorded in a tool.
Evidence by default
Because the whole campaign is structured and signed as it runs, the evidence is a byproduct, not a separate project. Export the full signed history, mapped to the access controls it satisfies, and hand auditors a clean record of who reviewed what, when, and what changed as a result.
Meet the periodic access-review requirement in SOC 2, ISO 27001, and similar frameworks with evidence to match.
Run reviews on a schedule with reminders so the quarterly cycle stops being a fire drill.
Let the managers who know their teams make the calls, with an interface simple enough that they finish.
Scope a tighter, more frequent review for sensitive or privileged access specifically.
Make sure revoke decisions actually result in removed access, not just a recorded intention.
Hand auditors a signed, control-mapped review history instead of reconstructing it from emails.
Capability and direction — built honestly, proven by your own evidence as deployments land.
An honest, capability-based view — how we approach the work, not unsourced claims about anyone else.
Revoke decisions are tracked to completion, so the control is satisfied by access that actually changed — not by a click in a tool.
Reviewers see current access pulled from connected systems, scoped to what's theirs, so reviews aren't guesswork against a stale export.
Signed, timestamped decisions are captured as the campaign runs, so audit evidence is an export rather than a reconstruction.
A simple per-user interface plus automated reminders means campaigns actually close — the hardest part of any review.
On whatever cadence you need — quarterly is common, but campaigns can be scheduled on a custom cycle, with automated reminders to keep reviewers on track.
The platform pulls together who has access to what from your connected systems and scopes it to each reviewer, so decisions are made against current, real access rather than a stale export.
The revoke decision is tracked to completion, not just recorded. The control is only satisfied when access has actually changed, so the loop is closed rather than left as an intention.
Yes. Every decision is signed with the reviewer, timestamp, and notes, and the full history exports mapped to the access controls it satisfies — ready to hand to an auditor.
Yes. Campaigns can be scoped by system, team, or sensitivity, so each reviewer only sees the access that's theirs and privileged access can get a tighter review.
Get a guided demo, or start by scanning any domain for free.