Identify risks in one shared register, score them consistently by likelihood and impact, link them to the controls that mitigate them, and watch residual risk fall as your posture improves — with a record that holds up in front of leadership and auditors.
Catalog risks with owner, category, source, and status in one shared, always-current place.
Score likelihood × impact for an inherent rating, then track residual risk after mitigating controls are applied.
Connect each risk to the controls that reduce it, so mitigation is explicit and measurable.
Group risks by category and source for a structured view across the whole register.
Move risks through identified, mitigated, accepted, transferred, or avoided — with dates and owners.
Document the decision and rationale behind every risk so your treatment is defensible under review.
Run structured assessments and reassessments on a cadence, not just once at onboarding.
Summarize risk posture and trend for leadership without rebuilding a deck each cycle.
Tie the register to the frameworks and controls it supports so risk work counts toward audits.
Step 1
Log risks with an owner, description, category, and source in one shared register — so nothing lives in someone's inbox or a forgotten tab.
Step 2
Rate likelihood and impact on a consistent scale for an inherent score the whole team reads the same way.
Step 3
Connect each risk to the controls that reduce it, then recompute residual risk to see what your program actually buys you.
Step 4
Mitigate, accept, transfer, or avoid — and record the rationale so the decision is defensible later.
Step 5
Summarize posture for leadership and keep every treatment decision audit-ready, with history intact.
One consistent scale
Risk falls apart when 'high' means something different to every reviewer. A consistent likelihood-and-impact scale produces an inherent score the whole team trusts, and the same method recomputes residual risk once mitigating controls are in place — so you can show the actual reduction your program delivers.
Risk tied to controls
A risk register that floats free of your controls is just a list of worries. Linking each risk to the controls that mitigate it turns the register into a working part of your program: when a control's posture changes, the risk it backs is right there, and reviewers can see exactly what reduces what.
Defensible decisions
Auditors and leadership don't just want to know your risks — they want to know what you decided and why. Each risk carries its treatment decision, owner, dates, and rationale, with history retained, so accepting a risk is a documented choice rather than an unexplained gap.
Produce the documented risk assessment SOC 2, ISO 27001, and similar frameworks expect — and keep it current.
Show auditors and leadership exactly which controls mitigate which risks, with residual scores to match.
Give executives a clear, trended view of top risks and treatment status without a manual deck.
Bring third-party risk into the same register so your overall posture is one view, not two systems.
Reassess on a cadence so the register reflects today's reality, not last year's snapshot.
Assign risks to the people who actually own them and track follow-through to closure.
Capability and direction — built honestly, proven by your own evidence as deployments land.
An honest, capability-based view — how we approach the work, not unsourced claims about anyone else.
Risks share the control and evidence model with the rest of the platform, so mitigation is real and measurable — not a column someone hopes is accurate.
Link mitigating controls and residual scores recompute, so the register reflects the reduction your program actually delivers.
Owners, dates, decisions, and rationale are captured as you go, so treatment decisions stand up under audit without a reconstruction effort.
Leadership and board views come straight from the live register, so each reporting cycle isn't a manual deck assembly.
Risks are scored on a consistent likelihood-and-impact scale to produce an inherent rating. Once mitigating controls are linked, the same method yields a residual rating, so you can see the reduction your controls provide.
Inherent risk is the exposure before controls are applied. Residual risk is what remains after the mitigating controls are in place. Tracking both shows how much your program actually reduces risk.
Yes. Each risk can be connected to the controls that mitigate it, and those controls map to the frameworks they support — so your risk work counts toward compliance and the relationships are explicit.
For each risk you record a treatment — mitigate, accept, transfer, or avoid — along with the owner, dates, and rationale. History is retained so the decision is defensible later.
It gives that process a living home. You still decide your methodology and risk appetite; the register makes assessment, scoring, treatment, and reporting repeatable and audit-ready.
Get a guided demo, or start by scanning any domain for free.